06-17-2005, 03:28 PM
|
#1
|
74
|
Halo 3...50 Person Multiplayer????
Let the rumors begin
Source:
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/gossip/...yer-108370.php
A new pack of Halo 3 rumors is spreading on the net today. Here’s a run down of what a friend of an uncle of a Bungie employee is reporting (Yeah, it’s that reliable):
1) It will have a darker and more gritty story than the previous games.
2) They’re attempting to maintain an online cooperative component for the campaign supporting more than two players at once.
3) It has a lot of cinematics planned for it. The opening scenes apparently occur thousands of years before the timeline of the original Halo: Combat Evolved’s story.
4) It will have a multiplayer mode which pits players against bots in scenarios that are directly connected to the story of the game.
5) They’re attempting to implement both a map editor and a movie maker, which would allow players to send and receive their maps/movies through Xbox Live. This would apparently be on a separate disc, and they have an entire team working just on these two projects.
6) Zanzibar, Sidewinder and Hang Em High are said to return to the multiplayer mode, completely reworked. Zanzibar will be mangled and torn apart as though after the battle, the sky will be dark red. Sidewinder will have four legs instead of just two, with bases at each end. Hang Em High will have a massive tree at its center and the structure will be deteriorated.
7) They want to support more than fifty players on Xbox Live for certain maps.
I'm getting giddy in the pants over these rumors, Hopefully som are true. Discuss.
__________________ Whoopin @$$ from coast to coast
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
06-17-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#3
|
867
Tool
 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rainman979
4) It will have a multiplayer mode which pits players against bots in scenarios that are directly connected to the story of the game.
|
Very cool...
To me this is the most important feature... 'cause I don't like competitions. I never compete. That's why I don't usually like playing FPS games in the internet. But that features changes everything.
As a side note, I don't hate to lose. Losing and winning are the same thing. 
__________________ 'Cause I was loaded, okay!?
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
06-19-2005, 10:15 AM
|
#7
|
2,237
Probationary Member
 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by surrealist
Anyone who's seen the ending to Halo 2 knows it's going to get darker and grittier.
|
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Now that I think about it, I'm kind of in agreement with Ky here. I can't really picture Halo as dark and gritty.
I mean they've already had the Flood animating dead corpses, an invasion of earth, weapons that are supposed to destroy all life in the galaxy, and the Arbiter fighting against his own people. If they can do all that without making it seem gritty, then it's never going to be.
We'll get plenty of darkness and grit from Quake IV, Gears of War, etc. Halo will continue to be Halo. 
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
06-21-2005, 07:44 PM
|
#12
|
447
Senior Member
 |
|
I think your just a chicken. The game was so predictable! " Oh man im running thru a dark hallway! Theres no real story to why im doing it. I don't even really have a name! Theres no reason why I shouldn't just shoot my self in the head, no one would miss me! OH crap, whats that behind me? Oh its just another zombie, ooh whats that in the darkness, something scary? Nope, just a big mutated pig, ill just kill it. BUt wait! I'm holding a damn flashlight! Man im to stupid and lazy to go find some duck tape. guess ill just let the zombie eat my brain, no one will miss me." Ok.. \
OK i really should have just pointed out the bad points of the game instead of telling a story.
So ill point it out very quickly.
1) No story.
2) " can't just duck tape my flash light to my gun? WHAT THE $%#^!)
3) Graphics are highly over rated ( maybe it looks better than halo but its still not as good as the Chronicals of Riddick)
4)The game isn't very scary. ( I've found pimples on my ass that are scaryer than this game... i mean how many times must I be attacked from behind by a guy with a shot gun, or a freakin hell pig before I say, " Ya know what, this sucks, im gonna go kill the guy who sold it to me".)
5)Its not really "3"... its just a remake of Doom One....
The only saving grace is the multi player. Co-op is extremely fun for some reason...deathmatch..not so much. Look if you want to be scared go play silent hill 4. If you want to play another first person shooter ( you don't trust me..) with good graphics ( by xbox standards), no story, and so-so multiplayer, this is for you, but ya know what, frankly I can think of better
things to do with my hands (.... masterbation joke...sorry just had to get one in...)
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
06-21-2005, 08:00 PM
|
#14
|
2,237
Probationary Member
 |
|
Okay, you who's arguing about how stupid the character is who can't tape his flashlight to his gun: I have a question for you.
If it were you in that game, which gun would you tape the light to? Would you pick one gun and stick with it the entire time? Or would you tear off the duct tape every time you switched weapons?
Btw, I don't think any game can ever scare somebody who doesn't want to be scared. If you want to just groan about how dumb it is, then of course it won't scare you. You have to let it scare you. I let Doom 3 scare me, and damn did it ever co-operate. 
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
06-22-2005, 07:50 AM
|
#15
|
74
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chareece
what do you two think about doom 3? i thought it was scary and i just played the demo. or maybe i'm a chicken.
|
Cluck Cluck baby 
__________________ Whoopin @$$ from coast to coast
|
Join Date: May 2005
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.
|